Los Angeles · New York · Managed by Obsidian Capital Partners

The Problem

Talent is treated as a vendor.

IAM treats talent as a founder.

Transactional by Design

Managers negotiate fees, talent performs, the relationship ends when the campaign ends. There is no residual ownership.

No Durable Ownership

Brands capture the equity. Managers collect commission. Nobody asks what the talent owns at the close of year three.

Value Flows One Way

The existing model was built to extract value from attention. It was not built to build long-horizon equity for talent.

The Thesis

We do not pitch talent. We select talent.

01 Recurring Revenue

Subscription-native businesses generate predictable monthly income — not one-time campaign fees. The model compounds over time without dilution.

02 Self-Funding Growth

Revenue at launch covers the cost of the next milestone. No external capital required to grow — the business pays for itself from month one.

03 Audience-Native Products

Products built for the audience that already trusts the talent — not built to acquire strangers through paid channels at increasing cost.

04 Infrastructure Ready

IAM arrives with the operating structure already in place. We model before we approach. We close with a term sheet, not a concept deck.

Economic Model

Why Subscription
Beats Endorsement

The model is not complicated. The discipline is in the selection. A subscriber who pays $20/month for 24 months is worth more than a brand deal that pays once.

Structure over Campaign
Model Comparison
Metric Traditional IAM
Revenue structure
One-timeMonthly recurring
Duration
Campaign cycleOngoing + compounding
Talent upside
Fee onlyEquity + rev share
Compounding
NoneSubscriber retention
Exit
Not applicableParticipation event
Scenario Economics

Three scenarios. One structural logic: organic launch → paid acceleration → compounding retention.

Conservative
~4,000
Active Subscribers · Month 24
~$370K / mo
~$6M · 2 yr
~55% YoY
Moderate
~35,000
Active Subscribers · Month 24
~$3M / mo
~$35M · 2 yr
~115% YoY
Optimistic
~215,000
Active Subscribers · Month 24
~$18M / mo
~$155M · 2 yr
~200%+ YoY

All three scenarios compound from the same organic launch foundation. The growth driver changes; the structure does not.

Talent Economics

Three compensation layers, structured from day one.

1 ·
Upfront Signing Payment
Talent is compensated at execution — before the business generates its first dollar of revenue. Skin in the game begins at the term sheet, not the first check.
2 ·
Personal Milestone Bonuses
Revenue thresholds trigger structured milestone payments. Growth is shared directly with the person who made it possible — on a schedule written into the operating agreement from day one.
3 ·
Equity in the Operating LLC
Talent is a founder. The operating entity is structured for exit participation. Talent owns a piece of what they built — it is in the agreement, not in the pitch.
"We pay talent to start. We pay talent as it grows. We pay talent when it exits."
Investment Categories

Three categories.
One structural thesis.

IAM selects talent operating at the intersection of high-LTV subscription markets and deep audience trust. We build where retention competes with addiction.

Portfolio Categories
Category 01
Consumer Health
& Wellness
LTV $480–$720
Category 02
Longevity &
Human Optimization
LTV $600–$960
Category 03
Personalized
Nutrition
LTV $360–$540

"The most valuable thing talent owns is not their talent. It is the trust their audience places in them."

IAM structures what that trust is worth.